VimUnDoZ!=[M>NQQ8nnnng_g&5_g; {% end   5_ gS {% endmarkdown %} 5_gU 5_dg The dead internet theory is a theory that claims that the internet is dead because the main activity is done by bots. Most communication is by bots is said. Well, it probably does matter what the definition of a bot is. If you consider any server that frequently 5_fg The dead internet theory is a theory that claims that the internet is dead because the main traffic is done by bots. Most communication is by bots is said. Well, it probably does matter what the definition of a bot is. If you consider any server that frequently 5_ng The dead internet theory is a theory that claims that the internet is dead because the main traffic is done by bots. Most communication is by bots is said. Well, it probably does matter what the definition of a bot is. If you consider any server that frequently 5_ g The dead internet theory is a theory that claims that the internet is dead because the main traffic is from bots. Most communication is by bots is said. Well, it probably does matter what the definition of a bot is. If you consider any server that frequently 5_ g The dead internet theory is a theory that claims that the internet is dead because the main traffic is from bots according to some. Well, it probably does matter what the definition of a bot is. If you consider any server that frequently 5_ g The dead internet theory is a theory that claims that the internet is dead because the main traffic is from bots according to some. Well, it probably does matter what the definition of bot is. If you consider any server that frequently 5_ g The dead internet theory is a theory that claims that the internet is dead because the main traffic is from bots according to some. Well, it probably does matter what the definition of bot traffic is. If you consider any server that frequently 5_ g The dead internet theory is a theory that claims that the internet is dead because the main traffic is from bots according to some. Well, it probably does matter what the definition of bot traffic is. If you consider any service that frequently 5_  g) 4The dead internet theory is a theory that claims that the internet is dead because the main traffic is from bots according to some. Well, it probably does matter what the definition of bot traffic is. If you consider any service that frequently checks if you have new notifications, i'm sure that's correct. 5_ 9gJ 9The dead internet theory is a theory that claims that the internet is dead because the main traffic is from bots according to some. Well, it probably does matter what the definition of bot traffic is. If you consider that any service that frequently checks if you have new notifications, i'm sure that's correct.  5_g 5_ g The dead internet theory is a theory that claims that the internet is dead because the main traffic is from bots according to some. Well, it probably does matter what the definition of bot traffic is. If you consider that any service that frequently checks if you have new notifications, i'm sure that's correct. When it comes to bots messaging on fora / social media, I have no idea. I do not think so to be honest. Sadly, it became common to call people with a certain way of thinking bots. Because of this, it's hard to figure out what the definition of bot traffic is if also humans are included. What is bot traffic should be a matter of definition, not based on what content it provides. So, you are in favor of Russia? You are a bot according to some. 5_ g  #Definition of bot traffic5_ g # Intrudction 5_ g # Introdution  5_g  5_ g# #Definition of bot traffic5_ g% # Definition of bot traffic5_g65_vg܅wThis is my own theory. It's a theory not that the internet is destroyed by bots replicating content but that we already have done it ourselves. Most articles are written by for the sake of writing the article. It's all information based on other articles. This is called desk journalism. Information you can figure out from the web without doing effort. It's a compilation of other articles but written in a nice way. By doing this, the real research articles are oversnowed. Also, people are biased to better written articles. The issue of those desk journalists is that it's their main skill. So the 'stupid' sound the smartest. 5_g?A few months ago, i went hardcore on writing a regex interpreter myself without doing research about it. I even had to learn regex itself decently. I mostly copied regexes from the internet like most people when I needed one. But I decided to make an interpreter and really wanted to figure out myself if I had the skills to do it. It was a long journey of months of study. I had a friend who studied programming languages and interpreters and did have advise from him if i had questions. That's all. Nothing regex specific. At a certain moment I came very far with writing my interpreter and it was time to research how others did it. So I discovered that state machines (FSA) are very common (but no golden hammer) to write regex interpreters with and saw literally every article using it. But since I gained a lot of experience with writing a full featured one, i saw that all code was incorrect. The writers of the articles all copied eachother.5_gXA few months ago, i went hardcore on writing a regex interpreter myself without doing research about it. I even had to learn regex itself decently. I mostly copied regexes from the internet like most people when I needed one. But I decided to make an interpreter and really wanted to figure out myself if I had the skills to do it. It was a long journey of months of study. I had a friend who studied programming languages and interpreters and did have advise from him if i had questions. That's all. Nothing regex specific. At a certain moment I came very far with writing my interpreter and it was time to research how others did it. So I discovered that state machines (FSA) are very common (but no golden hammer) to write regex interpreters with and saw literally every article using it. But since I gained a lot of experience with writing a full featured one, i saw that all code was incorrect. They had side effets or are written in way that would cause issues for further development. The writers of the articles all copied eachother.5_giThe internet was killed by the attitude of humans wanting to produce articles a long time ago. AI bots will maybe goldplate it a bit, but it's really us who killed it # 5_g 9The internet was killed by the attitude of humans wanting to produce articles a long time ago. AI bots will maybe goldplate it a bit, but it's really us who killed it in the first place. People with the writing skills that I really would love to have but not having thought a second about the content they share. 5_8g VThe internet was killed a long time ago caused probably the attitude of humans wanting to produce articles a long time ago. AI bots will maybe goldplate it a bit, but it's really us who killed it in the first place. People with the writing skills that I really would love to have but not having thought a second about the content they share. 5_Hg$PThe internet was killed a long time ago caused by the attitude of humans wanting to produce articles a long time ago. AI bots will maybe goldplate it a bit, but it's really us who killed it in the first place. People with the writing skills that I really would love to have but not having thought a second about the content they share. 5_ vg-RThe internet was killed a long time ago caused by the attitude of humans. wanting to produce articles a long time ago. AI bots will maybe goldplate it a bit, but it's really us who killed it in the first place. People with the writing skills that I really would love to have but not having thought a second about the content they share. 5_! agaA few months ago, i went hardcore on writing a regex interpreter myself without doing research about it. I even had to learn regex itself decently. I mostly copied regexes from the internet like most people when I needed one. But I decided to make an interpreter and really wanted to figure out myself if I had the skills to do it. It was a long journey of months of study. I had a friend who studied programming languages and interpreters and did have advise from him if i had questions. That's all. Nothing regex specific. At a certain moment I came very far with writing my interpreter and it was time to research how others did it. So I discovered that state machines (FSA) are very common (but no golden hammer) to write regex interpreters with and saw literally every article using it. But since I gained experience by writing a full featured one, i saw that all code was incorrect. They had side effets or are written in way that would cause issues for further development. The writers of the articles all copied eachother without having done research / having experience at all.5_)+*rgUA few months ago, i went hardcore on writing a regex interpreter myself without doing research about it. I even had to learn regex itself decently. I mostly copied regexes from the internet like most people when I needed one. But I decided to make an interpreter and really wanted to figure out myself if I had the skills to do it. It was a long journey of months of study. I had a friend who studied programming languages and interpreters and did have advise from him if i had questions. That's all. Nothing regex specific. At a certain moment I came very far with writing my interpreter and it was time to research how others did it. So I discovered that state machines (FSA) are very common (but no golden hammer) to write regex interpreters with and saw literally every article using it. But since I gained experience by writing a full featured one using my own reasoning, i saw that all code was incorrect. They had side effets or are written in way that would cause issues for further development. The writers of the articles all copied eachother without having done research / having experience at all.5_*,+~g [A few months ago, i went hardcore on writing a regex interpreter myself without doing research about it. I even had to learn regex itself decently. I mostly copied regexes from the internet like most people when I needed one. But I decided to make an interpreter and really wanted to figure out myself if I had the skills to do it. It was a long journey of months of study. I had a friend who studied programming languages and interpreters and did have advise from him if i had questions. That's all. Nothing regex specific. At a certain moment I came very far with writing my interpreter and it was time to research how others did it. So I discovered that state machines (FSA) are very common (but no golden hammer) to write regex interpreters with and saw literally every article using it. But since I gained experience by writing a full featured one using my own reasoning, I could say that all code was incorrect. They had side effets or are written in way that would cause issues for further development. The writers of the articles all copied eachother without having done research / having experience at all.5_+-,gbA few months ago, i went hardcore on writing a regex interpreter myself without doing research about it. I even had to learn regex itself decently. I mostly copied regexes from the internet like most people when I needed one. But I decided to make an interpreter and really wanted to figure out myself if I had the skills to do it. It was a long journey of months of study. I had a friend who studied programming languages and interpreters and did have advise from him if i had questions. That's all. Nothing regex specific. At a certain moment I came very far with writing my interpreter and it was time to research how others did it. So I discovered that state machines (FSA) are very common (but no golden hammer) to write regex interpreters with and saw literally every article using it. But since I gained experience by writing a full featured one using my own reasoning, I could say that nearly all code was incorrect. They had side effets or are written in way that would cause issues for further development. The writers of the articles all copied eachother without having done research / having experience at all.5_,.-)gBA few months ago, i went hardcore on writing a regex interpreter myself without doing research about it. I even had to learn regex itself decently. I mostly copied regexes from the internet like most people when I needed one. But I decided to make an interpreter and really wanted to figure out myself if I had the skills to do it. It was a long journey of months of study. I had a friend who studied programming languages and interpreters and did have advise from him if i had questions. That's all. Nothing regex specific. At a certain moment I came very far with writing my interpreter and it was time to research how others did it. So I discovered that state machines (FSA) are very common (but no golden hammer) to write regex interpreters with and saw literally every article using it. But since I gained experience by writing a full featured one using my own reasoning, I could say that nearly all code was incorrect. I fully understand because I walked the whole process of writing it myself instead of only reading it. I did the full thinking process. They had side effets or are written in way that would cause issues for further development. The writers of the articles all copied eachother without having done research / having experience at all.5_-/.VgO A few months ago, i went hardcore on writing a regex interpreter myself without doing research about it. I even had to learn regex itself decently. I mostly copied regexes from the internet like most people when I needed one. But I decided to make an interpreter and really wanted to figure out myself if I had the skills to do it. It was a long journey of months of study. I had a friend who studied programming languages and interpreters and did have advise from him if i had questions. That's all. Nothing regex specific. At a certain moment I came very far with writing my interpreter and it was time to research how others did it. So I discovered that state machines (FSA) are very common (but no golden hammer) to write regex interpreters with and saw literally every article using it. But since I gained experience by writing a full featured one using my own reasoning, I could say that nearly all code was incorrect. I fully understand because I walked the whole process of writing it myself instead of only reading it. I did the full thinking process. The sources mention in the articles had side effets or are written in way that would cause issues for further development. The writers of the articles all copied eachother without having done research / having experience at all.5_.0/gV A few months ago, i went hardcore on writing a regex interpreter myself without doing research about it. I even had to learn regex itself decently. I mostly copied regexes from the internet like most people when I needed one. But I decided to make an interpreter and really wanted to figure out myself if I had the skills to do it. It was a long journey of months of study. I had a friend who studied programming languages and interpreters and did have advise from him if i had questions. That's all. Nothing regex specific. At a certain moment I came very far with writing my interpreter and it was time to research how others did it. So I discovered that state machines (FSA) are very common (but no golden hammer) to write regex interpreters with and saw literally every article using it. But since I gained experience by writing a full featured one using my own reasoning, I could say that nearly all code was incorrect. I fully understand because I walked the whole process of writing it myself instead of only reading it. I did the full thinking process. The sources mention in the articles had side effects or are written in way that would cause issues for further development. The writers of the articles all copied eachother without having done research / having experience at all.5_/10wgrA few months ago, i went hardcore on writing a regex interpreter myself without doing research about it. I even had to learn regex itself decently. I mostly copied regexes from the internet like most people when I needed one. But I decided to make an interpreter and really wanted to figure out myself if I had the skills to do it. It was a long journey of months of study. I had a friend who studied programming languages and interpreters and did have advise from him if i had questions. That's all. Nothing regex specific. At a certain moment I came very far with writing my interpreter and it was time to research how others did it. So I discovered that state machines (FSA) are very common (but no golden hammer) to write regex interpreters with and saw literally every article using it. But since I gained experience by writing a full featured one using my own reasoning, I could say that nearly all code was incorrect. I fully understand because I walked the whole process of writing it myself instead of only reading it. I did the full thinking process. The sources mention in the articles had side effects or wouldn't scale well later. The writers of the articles all copied eachother without having done research / having experience at all.5_021[g[A few months ago, i went hardcore on writing a regex interpreter myself without doing research about it. I even had to learn regex itself decently. I mostly copied regexes from the internet like most people when I needed one. But I decided to make an interpreter and really wanted to figure out myself if I had the skills to do it. It was a long journey of months of study. I had a friend who studied programming languages and interpreters and did have advise from him if i had questions. That's all. Nothing regex specific. At a certain moment I came very far with writing my interpreter and it was time to research how others did it. So I discovered that state machines (FSA) are very common (but no golden hammer) to write regex interpreters with and saw literally every article using it. But since I gained experience by writing a full featured one using my own reasoning, I could say that nearly all code was incorrect. I fully understand because I walked the whole process of writing it myself instead of only reading it. I did the full thinking process. The sources mention in the articles had side effects or wouldn't scale well later. All the articles were only about the basics, but writing a full one is the art and that's impossible without a good base. The writers of the articles all copied eachother without having done research / having experience at all.5_132\g\A few months ago, i went hardcore on writing a regex interpreter myself without doing research about it. I even had to learn regex itself decently. I mostly copied regexes from the internet like most people when I needed one. But I decided to make an interpreter and really wanted to figure out myself if I had the skills to do it. It was a long journey of months of study. I had a friend who studied programming languages and interpreters and did have advise from him if i had questions. That's all. Nothing regex specific. At a certain moment I came very far with writing my interpreter and it was time to research how others did it. So I discovered that state machines (FSA) are very common (but no golden hammer) to write regex interpreters with and saw literally every article using it. But since I gained experience by writing a full featured one using my own reasoning, I could say that nearly all code was incorrect. I fully understand because I walked the whole process of writing it myself instead of only reading it. I did the full thinking process. The sources mention in the articles had side effects or wouldn't scale well later. All the articles were only about the basics, but writing a full one is the art and that's impossible without a good base. The writers of the articles all copied eachother without having done research / having experience at all.i5_243^g^A few months ago, i went hardcore on writing a regex interpreter myself without doing research about it. I even had to learn regex itself decently. I mostly copied regexes from the internet like most people when I needed one. But I decided to make an interpreter and really wanted to figure out myself if I had the skills to do it. It was a long journey of months of study. I had a friend who studied programming languages and interpreters and did have advise from him if i had questions. That's all. Nothing regex specific. At a certain moment I came very far with writing my interpreter and it was time to research how others did it. So I discovered that state machines (FSA) are very common (but no golden hammer) to write regex interpreters with and saw literally every article using it. But since I gained experience by writing a full featured one using my own reasoning, I could say that nearly all code was incorrect. I fully understand because I walked the whole process of writing it myself instead of only reading it. I did the full thinking process. The sources mention in the articles had side effects or wouldn't scale well later. All the articles were only about the basics, but writing a full one is the art and that's impossible without a good base. The writers of the articles all copied eachother without having done research / having experience at all. Iw5_354gD$# Regarding the dead internet theory5_465gD5_576gD# Introduction 5_687gDThe dead internet theory is a theory that claims that the internet is dead because the main traffic is from bots according to some. Well, it probably does matter what the definition of bot traffic is. 5_798gD5_8:9gD # Bot traffic5_9;:gD5_:<;gD.If you consider that any service that frequently checks if you have new notifications, i'm sure that's correct. When it comes to bots messaging on fora / social media, I have no idea. I do not think so to be honest. Sadly, it became common to call people with a certain way of thinking bots. Because of this, it's hard to figure out what the definition of bot traffic is if also humans are included. What is bot traffic should be a matter of definition, not based on what content it provides. So, you are in favor of Russia? You are a bot according to some. 5_;=<gE5_<>=gE# Brain dead theory 5_=?>gE5_>@?gEThis is my own theory. It's a theory not that the internet is destroyed by bots replicating content but that we already have done it ourselves. Most articles are written by for the sake of writing the article. It's all information based on other articles. This is called desk journalism. Information you can figure out from the web without doing effort. It's a compilation of other articles but written in a nice way. By doing this, the real research articles are oversnowed. Also, people are biased to better written articles. The issue of those desk journalists is that it's their main skill. So the desk journalist sounds credible while brining nothing new to the table. Even worse than the original content probably because they didn't really understand.5_?A@gE5_@BAgE## Example of desk journalism5_ACBgE5_BDCgEA few months ago, i went hardcore on writing a regex interpreter myself without doing research about it. I even had to learn regex itself decently. I mostly copied regexes from the internet like most people when I needed one. But I decided to make an interpreter and really wanted to figure out myself if I had the skills to do it. It was a long journey of months of study. I had a friend who studied programming languages and interpreters and did have advise from him if i had questions. That's all. Nothing regex specific. At a certain moment I came very far with writing my interpreter and it was time to research how others did it. So I discovered that state machines (FSA) are very common (but no golden hammer) to write regex interpreters with and saw literally every article using it. But since I gained experience by writing a full featured one using my own reasoning, I could say that nearly all code was incorrect. I fully understand because I walked the whole process of writing it myself instead of only reading it. I did the full thinking process. The sources mention in the articles had side effects or wouldn't scale well later. All the articles were only about the basics, but writing a full one is the art and that's impossible without a good base. The writers of the articles all copied eachother without having done research / having experience at all. I will write a seperate article about my journy of writing an regex interpreter. Because it's one for sure. I'm not the only one who did write about his journy. 5_CEDgE5_DFEgE # Conclusion5_EGFgE5_FHGgEThe internet was killed a long time ago caused by the attitude of people. The desk journalists. AI bots will maybe goldplate it a bit, but it's really us who killed it in the first place. Sadly, there are many people with amazing writing skills nothing to say. 5_GIHgF5_HJIgFMI hope not having writing skills is my only issue regarding content creation.5_IKJgG5_JLKgH 5_KMLgI JWelcome to my blog. I used to share my thoughts always at a dev community but it wasn't really the place in my opinion. While people didn't complain, I saw a limited amount of upvotes and I realized that not everyone is waiting on the opinion of a random person. But for the people who are interested in genuine honest opinions   5_LNMHg _Welcome to my blog. I used to share my thoughts always at a dev community but it wasn't really the place in my opinion. While people didn't complain, I saw a limited amount of upvotes and I realized that not everyone is waiting on the opinion of a random person. But for the people who are interested in genuine honest opinions I'm sharing them here. 5_MON g 5_NPOg Blog of retoor5_OQPg 5_PRQ g ##Welcome to my blog. I used to share my thoughts always at a dev community but it wasn't really the place in my opinion. While people didn't complain, I saw a limited amount of upvotes and I realized that not everyone is waiting on the opinion of a random person. But for the people who are interested in genuine honest opinions that are not just copied from somewhere, I'm sharing them here. Welcome to my blog. I used to share my thoughts always at a dev community but it wasn't really the place in my opinion. While people didn't complain, I saw a limited amount of upvotes and I realized that not everyone is waiting on the opinion of a random person. But for the people who are interested in genuine honest opinions that are not just copied from somewhere, I'm sharing them here.5_QSRg tI used to share my thoughts always at a dev community but it wasn't really the place in my opinion. While people didn't complain, I saw a limited amount of upvotes and I realized that not everyone is waiting on the opinion of a random person. But for the people who are interested in genuine honest opinions that are not just copied from somewhere, I'm sharing them here. ## Welcome to my blog. I used to share my thoughts always at a dev community but it wasn't really the place in my opinion. While people didn't complain, I saw a limited amount of upvotes and I realized that not everyone is waiting on the opinion of a random person. But for the people who are interested in genuine honest opinions that are not just copied from somewhere, I'm sharing them here.5_RTSg 5_SUT g tI used to share my thoughts always at a dev community but it wasn't really the place in my opinion. While people didn't complain, I saw a limited amount of upvotes and I realized that not everyone is waiting on the opinion of a random person. But for the people who are interested in genuine honest opinions that are not just copied from somewhere, I'm sharing them here.5_TVU Tg I'm quite extravert and need to vent my opinions.I used to share my thoughts always at a dev community but it wasn't really the place in my opinion. While people didn't complain, I saw a limited amount of upvotes and I realized that not everyone is waiting on the opinion of a random person. But for the people who are interested in genuine honest opinions that are not just copied from somewhere, I'm sharing them here.5_UWV Ug I'm quite extravert and need to vent my opinions.I used to share my thoughts at a dev community but it wasn't really the place in my opinion. While people didn't complain, I saw a limited amount of upvotes and I realized that not everyone is waiting on the opinion of a random person. But for the people who are interested in genuine honest opinions that are not just copied from somewhere, I'm sharing them here.5_VXW eg I'm quite extravert and need to vent my opinions.I used to share my thoughts at a developer community but it wasn't really the place in my opinion. While people didn't complain, I saw a limited amount of upvotes and I realized that not everyone is waiting on the opinion of a random person. But for the people who are interested in genuine honest opinions that are not just copied from somewhere, I'm sharing them here.5_WYX gG %I'm quite extravert and need to vent my opinions.I used to share my thoughts at a developer community but the community had a kinda thema not matching the thema of my content. The only matching things was that it was tech related. but it wasn't really the place in my opinion. While people didn't complain, I saw a limited amount of upvotes and I realized that not everyone is waiting on the opinion of a random person. But for the people who are interested in genuine honest opinions that are not just copied from somewhere, I'm sharing them here.5_XZY gH %I'm quite extravert and need to vent my opinions.I used to share my thoughts at a developer community but the community had a kinda thema not matching the thema of my content. The only matching things was that it was tech related. Sut it wasn't really the place in my opinion. While people didn't complain, I saw a limited amount of upvotes and I realized that not everyone is waiting on the opinion of a random person. But for the people who are interested in genuine honest opinions that are not just copied from somewhere, I'm sharing them here.5_Y[Z gS $I'm quite extravert and need to vent my opinions.I used to share my thoughts at a developer community but the community had a kinda thema not matching the thema of my content. The only matching things was that it was tech related. So it wasn't really the place in my opinion. While people didn't complain, I saw a limited amount of upvotes and I realized that not everyone is waiting on the opinion of a random person. But for the people who are interested in genuine honest opinions that are not just copied from somewhere, I'm sharing them here.5_Z\[ @g_ But for the people who are interested in genuine honest opinions that are not just copied from somewhere, I'm sharing them here. 5_[]\ gy But for the people who are interested in unique opinions, based on experience, not by other articles online, that are not just copied from somewhere, I'm sharing them here.5_\^] mg| But for the people who are interested in unique opinions, based on experience, not by other articles online, I'm sharing them here.5_]_^ mg} But for the people who are interested in unique opinions, based on experience, not by other articles online,I'm sharing them here.5_^`_ pg~ But for the people who are interested in unique opinions, based on experience, not by other articles online,I 'm sharing them here.5__a` g[  But for the people who are interested in unique opinions, based on experience, not by other articles online, sharing them here.5_`baLgM[The dead internet theory](/home/retoor/dream/blog/the-dead-internet-theory/)5_acbg#Blog of retoor5_bdcg# Blog of retoor5_cedg 5_dfeg5_egfg## Introduction5_fhgg5_gihgI'm quite extravert and need to vent my opinions.I used to share my thoughts at a developer community but the community had a kinda thema not matching the thema of my content. The only matching things was that it was tech related. So it wasn't really the place in my opinion. While people didn't complain, I saw a limited amount of upvotes and I realized that not everyone is waiting on the opinion of a random person. 5_hjig5_ikjg}But for the people who are interested in unique opinions, based on experience, not by other articles online, here's my blog. 5_jlkg5_kmlg ## Articles 5_lnmg 5_mng   # Articles # Articles5